What we missed
Albania 2-0 Belarus: We Got the Winner Wrong
We called Belarus to edge it at a neutral venue. Albania had other ideas. Here is what we missed and why the data still holds up going forward.

The Call We Got Wrong
We locked in Belarus to nick it. Albania won 2-0. That is the kind of result that demands honesty, not spin.
Our headline prediction was a 0-1 Belarus victory. The logic was straightforward: Belarus had kept four clean sheets in their last six outings, conceded barely anything, and Albania were playing at a neutral venue in the USA with none of the crowd advantage they would expect at home. On paper, a compact, defensively organised Belarus side picking off a leaky Albania on the break was a reasonable story.
Sheila
Albania have no home crowd here. Neutral venue in the USA, that 'home' advantage disappears entirely. Belarus are organised, compact, and they only need one moment.
That logic was not wrong. It just did not account for Albania finding two moments before Belarus found one. With no detailed event data available, we cannot tell you the exact minutes or scorers. What we can tell you is that both goals arrived in the first half, the match was effectively over at the break, and Belarus were shut out completely.
Where the Numbers Let Us Down
The markets tell a mixed but honest story. We went 5 from 9 on the card, and the two misses that hurt most were the ones we were most confident about.
The second-half goal call was our most embarrassing swing and miss.
Sheila
Someone will score in that second half. Fatigue, substitutions, chasing the game if it's 0-0. This is the easiest call on the board.
At 2-0 up at the break, Albania had every reason to sit in and protect what they had. Belarus, chasing the game, could not find a way through. The second half finished goalless, which made our "easiest call on the board" one of the ones that cost us.
The Belarus-to-score call was our other significant miss. We had them at 65.8% to get on the scoresheet based on their recent attacking output and Albania's defensive record of conceding nearly two per game. But defensive records and attacking averages built on domestic fixtures do not always translate cleanly to Nations League football at a neutral venue against a side that, on the night, was sharper and more clinical than anything their recent form suggested.
We also called away or draw at half time and ended up with Albania leading 2-0 at the break. That one lands squarely in the category of "the match did not play to type from the first whistle."
Where we were right: goals landing in the 1 to 4 range hit, Albania scoring hit, a goal in the first half hit, over 0.5 goals hit, and the away clean half hit, though it turned out both sides kept a clean second half rather than just Belarus. Five correct calls, four misses. Not the evening we wanted.
What We Take Forward
The Belarus defensive read was not wrong in isolation. Four clean sheets in six is a genuine pattern. What we underweighted was Albania's capacity to be a different side on a specific night, especially with their attacking players, Broja included, capable of punishing a team that perhaps came into the match believing the neutral venue would blunt their hosts.
The broader lesson here is one football keeps teaching us. When two sides with contrasting defensive and attacking profiles meet in a low-pressure format at a neutral venue, the side with momentum and confidence on the night can outperform their recent averages sharply. We had the shape of the match right. We had the winner wrong.
For both sides going forward, this result tells us Albania are capable of more than their recent form suggested. Belarus's defensive record now has a significant asterisk. We will be watching both closely next time out.
See every call Tom and Sheila have made, win or miss.
See the record